We've started sending out invitations to friends and people who signed up on Hunch. We're going to be launching the full public site in the coming months, but for now -- invitations! What is Hunch? Look. Decision-making is difficult, and decisions have to be made constantly. What should I be for Halloween? Do I need a Porsche? Does my hipster facial hair make me look stupid? Is Phoenix a good place to retire? Whom should I vote for? What toe ring should I buy? It's dark and lonely work. Coin-flipping, I Ching consultation, closing your eyes and jumping, postponing the inevitable, Rock-Paper-Scissors, and asking your sister are all time-honored means of coming to a decision -- and yet we think there's room for one more: Hunch. Hunch is a decision-making site, customized for you. Which means Hunch gets to know you, then asks you 10 questions about a topic (usually fewer!), and provides a result -- a Hunch, if you will. It gives you results it wouldn't give other people. Decision Trees Take a question often asked by tech-clueless family and friends: Should I switch to a Mac? If you ask someone who knows a lot about computers she'll start by asking you additional questions, like "What do you plan to use the computer for?" or "How much money are you willing to spend?". Then she'll give you an informed suggestion. If you don't have an expert handy you can try posting the question on a Q&A site, but you'll often end up with arguments -- even flamewars! -- about the merits of PCs vs Macs. Or you can read lots of reviews and informational sites about Macs and PC - effectively become an expert yourself - but who has the time? Those toe rings are not going to buy themselves. On Hunch, people can create a Topic (as we call it) that acts like a human expert, getting to a decision by asking relevant follow up questions and weighing trade offs. We think that it can ultimately save people lots of strenuous cognitive labor: not everyone who buys a computer needs to become a computer expert. Clay Shirky, I've got more cognitive surplus for you! Enough about me, let's talk about you In addition to helping you climb the decision tree, Hunch asks you a bunch of questions about yourself to find out more about what you're like and what you like. Hunch creates a kind of "taste profile" of you and people like you, which combine with topic-specific questions to deliver a hunch just for you. This is still very nascent -- we've had fewer than 200 people using the site so far -- but the more people use it, the better it will get. You Gee See You can create topics -- which are the "Super Questions" -- edit topics, add questions, edit questions, add results, edit results -- the bulk of the decision asking apparatus is user-changeable. As such Hunch looks a lot like Wikipedia circa 2001 -- mostly potential. Hunch staff, their friends, and other people whose arms we've twisted have contributed the 500 seed topics you see there today. Contributor site for now, full site later Hunch is currently a "contributor" or "power user" version of the site. It's not really ready for general use, as it needs a lot of people using it to get better. Right now it's like visiting Wikipedia in 2001. Later, the logged out, bunny hill version will be simple-- ask questions, get results. We'll get to know the user in the simplest possible way, then help them make decisions -- just click and click and click. Bold! Different! We're not biting ankles. We're not tagging along. Boldly striking out in new directions, the Brilliant and Noble Heroes of Hunch. Hunch is a new, odd, risky thing. One of the reasons I love working on this is because I anticipate users will surprise us by doing things with the software that we don't expect. When we started Flickr it was hard to classify -- was it a social network? a platform? a hosting service? blog software? It turned out to be a lot of things we're still trying to get our heads around. Blushing crimson The site you're seeing is super early stage, though we've eschewed the "beta" figleaf. We tried to get as many things right as we could, but we probably got a lot of things wrong. In fact, we're sure of it. Let us know what we can fix, what's dumb, baffling and terrible, glaringly obvious things we totally missed. Taste profiles and similarity to other users won't work really well until there are many more users. Those features will be iffy for a while. We know the topic-adding wizard needs work. There are only 500 topics, and they need grooming like your hipster stache needs grooming. A friend said if you launch something you're not at all embarrassed by, then you've waited too long. We're blushing, but we'll keep iterating til it's great. Follow the money The business of Hunch will be referral fees from external sites for the subset of topics that have to do with products and services. Monetization is not really going on now, though we do have some affiliate links to Amazon and others. We're not marketing things to people that they don't want, or hoarding and selling people's data, and of course the presence of a link has no effect on Hunch decision results. Developers Developers Developers Developers* There is, of course, an API, which will launch with the full site, so you can, say, write a program that figures out how special you are, or a Facebook Nemesis finder. Maybe someday our data can help people solve the "Napoleon Dynamite" problem ). It's fun. Thanks for checking it out. Hunch time! ................................................. * Did you know "Developers Developers Developers Developers" is an example of an epizeuxis? (My parents paid good money for a college education largely in poetics; I need to use it whenever I can.)

hunch people questions developers decision topics topic needs asking expert money user start users edit computer full friends click later

This was a redesign of the start page I must have done @ May 2004, based on the date in the mockup or screenshot. Just found it on my server! You'll notice the grey background, which we eventually got rid of. Bit too fond of bgcolor and strokes around them! I still think the right side orientation for photos is better than the left, based on what I call the Ingrid Bergman principle. In Casablanca, the director put Ingrid Bergman on the right side of the screen whenever possible, since Westerners usually start looking on the left and rest on the right (and she's a lot better looking than Humphrey Bogart) Likewise, most people are right-handed, so the good stuff, the clickable stuff, should be on the right too.

bergman base ingrid start looking side page strokes director photos bogart done server circa clickable eventually possible westerners home humphrey

People, especially Italians, especially (apparently) the Sienese, are so seeking of kinship and belonging, so clannish and teamclustering, it's awesome, almost an art form: Contrade of Siena These districts were set up in the Middle Ages in order to supply troops to the many military companies that were hired to defend Siena as it fought to defend its independence from Florence and other nearby city states. As time has gone by, however, the contrade have lost their administrative and military functions and have instead become simply areas of localised patriotism, held together by the emotions and sense of civic pride of the residents. Their roles have broadened so that every important event - baptisms, deaths, marriages, church holidays, victories at the Palio, even wine or food festivals - is celebrated only within one's own contrada. Every contrada has its own museum, fountain and baptismal font, motto, allied contrada (only Oca has no allies) and enemy contrada (only four - Bruco, Drago, Giraffa and Selva - have no declared enemies). Real Sienese don't referre to their enemy contrade as an enemy just merely an adversary. Often the adversary contrades share borders.

enemy contrada contrade defend adversary siena especially military sienese independence italians ally food apparently drago states civic four merely held

My (awesome, brilliant) colleague at Hunch, Hugo Liu, has a piece in a Shanghainese journal, Cultural Review, entitled "Small happiness: aesthetic strategies for witting consumers". He's not online right now, otherwise I'd ask him if there's a copy of the whole piece, but I'm intrigued by the excerpt on his site. He says "true happiness becomes substantial when it not only endures, but in fact, creates and flourishes" and "with the wisdom of a well-trained imagination, each passing day we will even recognize new beauties in that which is already before us". He calls this "small" happiness -- happinesses that once you know how to recognize, capture and experience them, accrete, thereby becoming "true" happiness that endures over time. (For all you social software nerds out there, he's also got a lot of interesting work in social networks, taste, recommendations and computational aesthetics.)

happiness piece recognize social true endures thereby flourishes fact becomes imagination cultural excerpt accrete awesome whole wisdom shanghainese intrigued entitl

Last night I saw one of the most disturbing movies that I've ever seen, We Live in Public by Ondi Timoner, which won the Grand Jury Prize for a US Documentary at Sundance, and which has not yet been released to general viewing. It's the story of Josh Harris, the founder of what is now Jupiter Communications, who at one time was worth $80 million. He spent a lot of his money launching Pseudo, an online TV network, and throwing extravagant Mondo 2000-era parties in which supermodels clad only in pasties and fake fur short-shorts cavorted with bespectacled geeks in an environment comprised mostly of inflatables, drugs, tin foil and strobe lights. Subsequently, and for millions more dollars, he created Quiet, an underground bunker where dozens of people lived for a month in 1999, replete with an interrogation room, communal shower and hundreds of cameras trained on people defecating, having sex, beating each other up and generally behaving like animals for the sake of the spectacle. Next, he put himself under surveillance, installing dozens of cameras in the apartment where he lived with his girlfriend Tanya, living his life entirely "in public" with people in the chat rooms telling them what to do, watching their fights, participating in their most intimate moments. The relationship fell apart under the pressure of their strange, dehumanizing circumstances, and Josh's money was lost in the bust. Having lost his money and his mind, Harris retired to an orchard in the country, lived for a while in Ethiopia, tried and failed to start again. Jason Calacanis, after seeing the film at Sundance, mused on the end of empathy, pointing out that when we start communicating with each other digitally, emotional cues of face-to-face interaction are lost -- including tone, facial expression and the so called "blush response". This leads to bullying, and consequences such as the vicious, sexist death threats against Kathy Sierra, the suicide of Abraham Biggs on Justin.tv while his audience egged him on; and the suicide of Megan Meier after her classmate's mother tortured her using a MySpace profile named "Josh Evans". A suggestion from Jason: The bullying in Korea has become so intense that you're now required to use your Social Security Number to sign up for a social network. This lack of anonymity is one of the most enlightened things I've heard of from one of the most advanced -- if not the most advanced -- Internet communities in the world. Ownership of one's behavior? Who knew?!?!? I'm sure some of the wacky Internet contingents will flame me for saying that anonymity is a bad thing, but the fact is that anonymous environments create this. This kind of sociopathic behavior -- treating people like things -- is one of the most horrifying aspects of online interactions, and something that its very nature promotes. Jason's piece is really interesting on this topic, and I encourage you to read it. And see the movie when it comes out in theatres. It is somewhat hard to take, but thought-provoking for all of us living our lives online.

live people josh lost online money jason cameras network internet behavior create suicide under sundance start public living face anonymity

We've been busy. Since we launched Hunch, over 4.3 million questions have been answered, counting both THAY questions (Teach Hunch About You) and topic question/answers. This is phenomenal, and gives us a ton of data to work with. In the past, statistical prediction like Amazon's collaborative filtering has usually been for one subject only -- i.e. Netflix will look at the movies you like and recommend other movies. And who hasn't bought a John Grisham novel only to have Amazon recommend *other* John Grisham novels? Um, duh. Cross-topic correlations like Hunch has are likely to be more interesting. Next week we are planning to give researchers access to our data in what we're calling the "academic" API to distinguish it from the, say, "widget" API, which will be released when the site goes public. It's all anonymous and aggregated data of course. Leave a comment below if you're a researcher who wants in. Some remarkable correlations have emerged from the data already, some of which we posted on Twitter and on the Hunch blog: People who believe that alien abductions are real are more likely to blame Nancy Pelosi for the financial crisis. People who have broken a leg like video games such as Madden NFL 09 and NBA 2K9, whereas non-leg-breakers prefer Little Big Planet, Katamari Damacy, Super Mario Galaxy and World of Goo One of the best predictors of whether people agree they should switch to a Mac: whether they like to dance. Are PC users less fun? The data has spoken. Have you used a fake ID to do something you weren't supposed to? It's OK, we won't hold it against you here at Hunch. Fake ID users are more likely to be happy at startups. The Facebook vs. Twitter topic brought up more interesting stuff: Facebook people, at parties "interact with many, including strangers" whereas Twitter devotees "Interact with a few, known to them". Facebookers buy shampoo that costs more than $7, Twitterers prefer to spend less on their hair, thank you very much. What else? Facebookers are significantly more likely to have had an alcoholic drink in the past 24 hours. Twitterers seem to be less social than Facebookers. But maybe it's because Twitterers report that they have oily skin -- it's the zits! Now that we have this data, we can improve the Secret Sauce so that all of Hunch's results are tailored to not only you, but people like you who have entered in only a small amount of data (ie, logged out users). And we can add a bunch of features we've had planned but didn't have the data to implement. We can tell you more about different facets of yourself, and cluster you with other people. We can tell you how much of an outlier you are, or how non-unique. Now things get fun. If you haven't tried Hunch yet, go sign up and we'll send you an invitation. And thanks to everyone who's already contributed.

hunch data people likely twitterers twitter less topic facebookers users whereas fake prefer grisham john questions amazon recommend interact whether

I found something I'd clipped out of a paper copy of Wired: Three Smart Things about Sleeping Late. I have a collection of these kinds of things, to arm myself for confrontations with readers of Poor Richard's Almanac. It's short, so I'll post the entirety of it here: You may need more sleep than you think Research by Henry Ford Hospital Sleep Disorders Center found that people who slept eight hours and then claimed they were "well rested" actually performed better and were more alert if they slept another two hours. That figures. Until the invention of the lightbulb (damn you, Edison!), the average person slumbered 10 hours a night. Night owls are more creative. Artists, writers, and coders typically fire on all cylinders by crashing near dawn and awakening at the crack of noon. In one study, "evening people" almost universally slam-dunked a standardized creativity test. Their early-bird brethren struggled for passing scores. Rising early is stressful. The stress hormone cortisol peaks in your blood around 7 am. So if you get up then, you may experience tension. Grab some extra Zs! You'll wake up feeling less like Bert, more like Ernie.

sleeping early sleep three people slept smart richard universally eight center wire short collection evening ford nrising edison slumber night

perendinate: To put off until the day after tomorrow. Useful!

nuseful tomorrow until word

We've been releasing a bunch of sexy Hunch data via the academic API, which has revealed all kinds of great, and often hilarious, correlations such as the fact that people who are frequently thrown out of bars for rowdy behavior have worn cufflinks during the past several weeks. (You won't be able to get to a bunch of these links unless you're logged into Hunch.) All the sexy data is a byproduct of the larger goals of Hunch and what we're really trying to do is use this data to help people make better decisions. As my friend Chris said yesterday, doing research online is something that super adept internet users, like us geeks, already know how to do, and is how we have been using the web to do our research since it began. We've trained ourselves to think like a computer and enter in just the right keywords to find what we need. We talked about how incredulous our geek (snob) peers are that so many people use Answers sites like Yahoo Answers (which I worked on) and Mahalo. We talked about how circa 1999 a lot of people publishing weblogs snorted at the idea of using "blogging software" like Blogger or Movable Type -- when we had Perl scripts or BBEdit and ftp why would we need anything else? Hunch is essentially a tool for experts to help non experts -- and when we say experts, we don't necessarily mean people with Ph.D.s, but more often people who have taken the time to do research. For example, a colleague was researching whether or not he should spend the time and money to register a trademark, how much it cost, what the benefits would be. Once he was done, he could build a Hunch topic and share that research with others. Others who had similar experience with it could add their expertise as well. Hunch is re-indexing information that is already out in the world, and on the web, and putting it in the form of decision trees. Someday, after the system learns enough about people, it should work like a really awesome Magic 8 ball on steroids and just give you the answer you need. It's not awesome yet, but will, we hope, be awesome in the future. On the Transcapitalist site yesterday, I found a post about a Hunch credit card search that's an early indicator of possible future awesomeness: I am glad to have tried it. The first question that I explored, "which credit card should I own?", led me to an answer by asking seven related questions--are you willing to pay an annual fee? do you want your rewards to be in travel, cash back, or points? what is your bank preference, if any? what is your credit score? etc.." It took me about 30 seconds to answer these questions and then the site produced a #1 recommendation: the Chase Freedom Card. That IS my credit card of choice! The decision that took me hours of online research, informal polling of my friends, time sitting around making sure this was the right card for me was answered on Hunch in 30 seconds. Wow. We find some of these posted on the site, like this one from the Canon PowerShot SD770IS 10MP Digital Camera Pros/Cons, written by Hunch user Kim Rossi: "Took this to see how accurate it would be. My top result was the camera I actually bought six months ago! Well done, Hunch." Hooray! A lot of the time Hunch still fails, but the more that it gets used, and the more different people we have adding tiny bits of data, the better it will get. We need to stay humble, stick to our knitting and keep improving it. Kaizen! Another anecdotal success story from a new user, awgraham: We went through a couple of different questions just to see look at the UI and get a feel for things. Then, I did the "pick a college" thread. I answered all of the questions and the top result was the actual school that I attended - Miami University, Oxford, Ohio. Unreal. Then my friend did it and the two schools that she chose between showed up as #2 and #4 respectively, UC Davis, and Texas. Amazing. This is where we're trying to go.

hunch people answer research card data questions credit experts trying awesome already seconds post camera done yesterday talk online friend

I knew it! Sent to me by ArtMusicLife on Twitter, some research on Early birds and night owls, which shows that in the morning both types have the same mental capacities, but towards evening, Night Owls stay more alert: So even though both groups were sleeping and waking according to their preferred schedule, night owls generally outlasted early birds in how long they could stay awake and mentally alert before becoming mentally fatigued. The fMRI supported the behavioral results: 10.5 hours after waking up, the early birds had lower activity in brain regions linked to attention and the circadian master clock, compared to night owls.

night birds early owls stay waking alert mentally knew brain clock outlast morning support types lower master circadian groups fmri

David Brooks writes about Genius - The Modern View whereby we leave the Romantic view of a genius inspired by divine spark, and take a more prosaic view -- that we learn to be geniuses by effort and application. He mentions two books that have been recently published on this theme, "The Talent Code " by Daniel Coyle; and "Talent Is Overrated " by Geoff Colvin. According to Colvin, Ben Franklin would take essays from The Spectator magazine and translate them into verse. Then he'd translate his verse back into prose and examine, sentence by sentence, where his essay was inferior to The Spectator's original. Coyle describes a tennis academy in Russia where they enact rallies without a ball. The aim is to focus meticulously on technique. (Try to slow down your golf swing so it takes 90 seconds to finish. See how many errors you detect.)

view genius sentence colvin talent verse translate spectator errors romantic russia golf modern whereby brooks theme enact code essay academy

White-collar fugitives...often fail to escape the law because of what prosecutors and bounty hunters say is a lack of preparation for the rigors of life on the lam....White-collar fugitives often run out of money or lack the mental sturdiness to elude police, said Duane Chapman, star of the television program "Dog the Bounty Hunter." This is an amusing article. White collar criminals tend to buy their own hype, and so have a hard time leaving behind their elite lifestyles and high flying ways. I'm imagining these guys are wearing Phillippe Patek watches as they're pulled in. And it seems somehow significant that one of the fugitives featured on America's Most Wanted that has NOT been captured is a woman.

collar fugitives lack bounty often lifestyles sturdiness amusing pull wearing tend program seems flying captur escape america rigors featur star

In Vietnam, teenage daughters sold into sex slavery More than 600,000 young women are trafficked each year around the world, according to a U.S. State Department estimate. In Vietnam, the government recently reported that last year there were 6,684 victims of trafficking, with 2,579 returned to their homes. It also said there were 21,038 people reported missing who could have been sold into prostitution. Experts, though, question the accuracy of the Vietnam government's statistics and fear the numbers are higher. At the bottom of the article, some ways you can help.

vietnam year report sold government teenage recently missing nmore state numbers department fear slavery accuracy question return traffick daughters according

He who knows nothing, loves nothing. He who can do nothing understands nothing. He who understands nothing is worthless. But he who undersands also loves, notices, sees...the more knowledge is inherent in a thing, the greater the love...Anyone who imagines that all fruits ripen at the same time as the strawberries knows nothing about grapes. -- Paracelsus

nothing understands loves knows greater grapes sees ripen undersands anyone imagines fruits paracelsus love worthless strawberry knowledge inherent notices

We launched Hunch early this morning (w00t!) and there's already been a ton of great press. Here is some of it: Hunch: a real decision engine on Search Engine Land, by Matt McGee Hunch: your personal decision maker on Search Engine Land, by Greg Sterling. This is great, there are two different posts, one a descriptive walk-though, another about how it fits into the rest of the "space". 'Hunch' Web site will make decisions for you on CNN.com by John D. Sutter Hunch Launches, Reinvents How You Make Decisions on Mashable, by Ben Parr Caterina Fake's Hunch: "Yahoo Answers Is Not The Answer." on TechCrunch by Erick Schonfeld. (It's possible I actually said that, but it sounds bad taken out of context, and is not the main idea or impulse behind Hunch! Makes great copy though.) Hunch wants you to give it some ideas on L.A. Times by David Sarno Hunch: The Search for Better Search on Business Week by Douglas MacMillan Hunch: A Cure for Indecision On MIT Technology Review, by Erica Naone. Hunch Answers Questions Based on Your Personality on Lifehacker by Kevin Purdy Flickr Co-founder's new Hunch on Wall Street Journal by Andrew Lavallee And some more: ABC News TechBytes I have a Hunch this might work for me on the Post Independent by April Clark Seraching for Lunch? Ask Hunch! on New York Observer, by Gillian Reagan

nhunch hunch search great engine decision decisions land answers press questions main schonfeld taken personality kevin wall lavallee morning macmillan